<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How Democracy changed everything, and what the CBC needs to do to compete with the pirates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://misener.org/archives/252/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://misener.org/archives/252</link>
	<description>an internet weblog from Dan Misener</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 May 2012 21:35:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Misener dot com - CBC TV + Bittorrent</title>
		<link>http://misener.org/archives/252#comment-14164</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Misener dot com - CBC TV + Bittorrent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 12:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danmisener.com/archives/252#comment-14164</guid>
		<description>[...] has already been practically everywhere, but since it&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve been wishing for for a long time, I&#8217;ll mention that CBC TV is planning to release television programs via [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has already been practically everywhere, but since it&#8217;s something I&#8217;ve been wishing for for a long time, I&#8217;ll mention that CBC TV is planning to release television programs via [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan</title>
		<link>http://misener.org/archives/252#comment-13552</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danmisener.com/archives/252#comment-13552</guid>
		<description>Phil has spoken. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil has spoken. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Thrill</title>
		<link>http://misener.org/archives/252#comment-13550</link>
		<dc:creator>The Thrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 16:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danmisener.com/archives/252#comment-13550</guid>
		<description>AAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrgh!! 
 
Yes, Brian, you ARE stealing.  Are you gonna stop now? 
 
Like it or not, broadcasters and the owners of copyright of a show have the right to determine how that show gets distributed.  While, as a consumer, you may think it makes total sense for you to copy the digital version to other platforms and have it whenever you want, (that&#039;d be sweet) the fact of the matter is that the broadcasters are under no obligation to cater to you - if they want to make your life difficult, they can.  THAT&#039;S THEIR RIGHT.  (even if it means going out of business)  If you want to stick it to them and get them to change their business models, DON&#039;T WATCH.  Make the sacrifice.  But don&#039;t circumvent their shitty system with an illegal one and claim innocence.  If you&#039;re getting something for free that you&#039;re theoretically supposed to be paying for YOU&#039;RE STEALING. 
 
ABC/NBC/FOX/whomever need to keep up...with whom?  The pirates?  There does not exist a business model that allows broadcasters to &quot;sell&quot; their product in digital format for cheaper than f***ing free!!!  That&#039;s what torrents offer.  So unless someone somewhere can come up with one, it&#039;s time for downloaders to STFU, admit that what they&#039;re doing is theft (NOT protest - protest would be to boycott the product - do you REALLY need to watch The Office?) and face the illegally downloaded music. 
 
I would love a Porsche.  I want a Porsche.  I have two choices: save up and buy or do without.  I can&#039;t go out and hotwire one from the showroom and claim I&#039;m sticking it to the man and just doing with it what I want as a consumer - &#039;cause after all, they should make an affordable Porsche that doesn&#039;t require a stupid key.   Either buy the cable service or do without. 
 
Seriously: even if you could download the show from the broadcaster&#039;s website for a mere $1-$2 a pop, would you?  And for the few people who would, does that make it worth it to the broadcaster?  I doubt it.   
 
Yes, the system sucks, yes there&#039;s DRM, yes there are RIAA goons - but downloading is just another form of the five finger discount.  Period.  
 
(BTW - Democracy may be making inroads, but it&#039;s only because they can rip quality tv.  If the apocalypse comes and broadcasters fall, and Democracy &quot;wins&quot;, what exactly do you think the content is going to be like?  Lost?  House?  ER?  CSI?  F**k all that sh*t, Silent Bob, it&#039;s gonna be like YouTube.  Countless morons looking for their fifteen minutes by posting a flood of videos that cost nothing to produce - &#039;cause there&#039;s no money to be made.  Do YOU want to have your tv replaced by YouTube videos?  I certainly don&#039;t.  In order to access House, Lost and my UFC fix, I&#039;m willing to shell out for cable and to buy a VCR - yes, Dan, a VCR does the job!  ...Until I can afford a PVR.) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AAaaaaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrrgh!!</p>
<p>Yes, Brian, you ARE stealing.  Are you gonna stop now?</p>
<p>Like it or not, broadcasters and the owners of copyright of a show have the right to determine how that show gets distributed.  While, as a consumer, you may think it makes total sense for you to copy the digital version to other platforms and have it whenever you want, (that&#039;d be sweet) the fact of the matter is that the broadcasters are under no obligation to cater to you &#8211; if they want to make your life difficult, they can.  THAT&#039;S THEIR RIGHT.  (even if it means going out of business)  If you want to stick it to them and get them to change their business models, DON&#039;T WATCH.  Make the sacrifice.  But don&#039;t circumvent their shitty system with an illegal one and claim innocence.  If you&#039;re getting something for free that you&#039;re theoretically supposed to be paying for YOU&#039;RE STEALING.</p>
<p>ABC/NBC/FOX/whomever need to keep up&#8230;with whom?  The pirates?  There does not exist a business model that allows broadcasters to &quot;sell&quot; their product in digital format for cheaper than f***ing free!!!  That&#039;s what torrents offer.  So unless someone somewhere can come up with one, it&#039;s time for downloaders to STFU, admit that what they&#039;re doing is theft (NOT protest &#8211; protest would be to boycott the product &#8211; do you REALLY need to watch The Office?) and face the illegally downloaded music.</p>
<p>I would love a Porsche.  I want a Porsche.  I have two choices: save up and buy or do without.  I can&#039;t go out and hotwire one from the showroom and claim I&#039;m sticking it to the man and just doing with it what I want as a consumer &#8211; &#039;cause after all, they should make an affordable Porsche that doesn&#039;t require a stupid key.   Either buy the cable service or do without.</p>
<p>Seriously: even if you could download the show from the broadcaster&#039;s website for a mere $1-$2 a pop, would you?  And for the few people who would, does that make it worth it to the broadcaster?  I doubt it.  </p>
<p>Yes, the system sucks, yes there&#039;s DRM, yes there are RIAA goons &#8211; but downloading is just another form of the five finger discount.  Period. </p>
<p>(BTW &#8211; Democracy may be making inroads, but it&#039;s only because they can rip quality tv.  If the apocalypse comes and broadcasters fall, and Democracy &quot;wins&quot;, what exactly do you think the content is going to be like?  Lost?  House?  ER?  CSI?  F**k all that sh*t, Silent Bob, it&#039;s gonna be like YouTube.  Countless morons looking for their fifteen minutes by posting a flood of videos that cost nothing to produce &#8211; &#039;cause there&#039;s no money to be made.  Do YOU want to have your tv replaced by YouTube videos?  I certainly don&#039;t.  In order to access House, Lost and my UFC fix, I&#039;m willing to shell out for cable and to buy a VCR &#8211; yes, Dan, a VCR does the job!  &#8230;Until I can afford a PVR.) </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tristan</title>
		<link>http://misener.org/archives/252#comment-13548</link>
		<dc:creator>Tristan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 09:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danmisener.com/archives/252#comment-13548</guid>
		<description>There may be problems with the CBC legally distributing a show like Little Mosque in this way. For example, Mosque is expected to be a big player (as far as Canadian dramatic programming goes, anyway) at MIPTV in Cannes next week. If the CBC was already distributing the entire season, commercial free, over the Internet, I&#039;d imagine that would make it a much harder sale in the International market, no? Sure, you can already get it FOR FREE illegally, but somehow this doesn&#039;t phase these sorts of deals. However, I&#039;d imagine that a legally distributed digital version of this show would have a negative impact on traditional broadcast sales. 
 
But then again, I can buy Huff on DVD over at HMV right now, even though Showcase hasn&#039;t even finished airing it yet, so what do I know? </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There may be problems with the CBC legally distributing a show like Little Mosque in this way. For example, Mosque is expected to be a big player (as far as Canadian dramatic programming goes, anyway) at MIPTV in Cannes next week. If the CBC was already distributing the entire season, commercial free, over the Internet, I&#039;d imagine that would make it a much harder sale in the International market, no? Sure, you can already get it FOR FREE illegally, but somehow this doesn&#039;t phase these sorts of deals. However, I&#039;d imagine that a legally distributed digital version of this show would have a negative impact on traditional broadcast sales.</p>
<p>But then again, I can buy Huff on DVD over at HMV right now, even though Showcase hasn&#039;t even finished airing it yet, so what do I know? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://misener.org/archives/252#comment-13546</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 03:43:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danmisener.com/archives/252#comment-13546</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I agree with what you are saying. I&#039;m not sure downloading TV shows is technically stealing. I pay for television service (DirecTV), but yet I choose to download TV shows at the same time. Does this make me a criminal? I do this for any number of reasons. To name a few: 1. High definition DVRs are expensive, buggy and otherwise cumbersome to operate (see Comcast&#039;s HD DVR and all the problems it has) 2. I have unlimited freedom to do with what I want with the shows once downloaded; specifically, I like to copy them to my laptop and watch them on the plane, on the train, on the bus to work, etc. If ABC/NBC/FOX/whomever wants to keep up, then they need to give people the freedom they deserve. After all, its not like you pay for &quot;The Office&quot; anyway. Where I live, its broadcast to me whether I want it or not. And what about the people in Australia who simply don&#039;t get shows like Lost or 24. Or rather they get them, but they are just years behind. There is actually some good intent behind downloading -- not just sticking it to the TV show companies and producers. I for one value their work and if I honestly thought it was stealing I wouldn&#039;t do it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#039;m not sure I agree with what you are saying. I&#039;m not sure downloading TV shows is technically stealing. I pay for television service (DirecTV), but yet I choose to download TV shows at the same time. Does this make me a criminal? I do this for any number of reasons. To name a few: 1. High definition DVRs are expensive, buggy and otherwise cumbersome to operate (see Comcast&#039;s HD DVR and all the problems it has) 2. I have unlimited freedom to do with what I want with the shows once downloaded; specifically, I like to copy them to my laptop and watch them on the plane, on the train, on the bus to work, etc. If ABC/NBC/FOX/whomever wants to keep up, then they need to give people the freedom they deserve. After all, its not like you pay for &quot;The Office&quot; anyway. Where I live, its broadcast to me whether I want it or not. And what about the people in Australia who simply don&#039;t get shows like Lost or 24. Or rather they get them, but they are just years behind. There is actually some good intent behind downloading &#8212; not just sticking it to the TV show companies and producers. I for one value their work and if I honestly thought it was stealing I wouldn&#039;t do it. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

